Ray v. California Home Building Loan Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 9890 · 1935-05-31 · Published · 7 Cal. App. 2d 275

MARTIN E. RAY v. CALIFORNIA HOME BUILDING LOAN COMPANY, etc.

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Ordinarily mcun4amus will not lie to compel a transfer of corporate stock; a suit in equity is the *276proper remedy. There is nothing contained in the petition to show that this remedy is inadequate. (Spangenberg v. Western Heavy Hardware & Iron Co., 166 Cal. 284 [135 Pac. 1127].) The petition is denied.

Cites, in this corpus

Spangenberg v. W. Heavy Hardware & Iron Co. S.F. No. 6404. · 1913-10-04

Cited by

Ray v. California Home Building Loan Co. Civ. No. 9890 · 1935-05-31