People v. Watson
THE PEOPLE v. EUGENE WATSON
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
The defendant appealed from a judgment following his conviction on a charge of assault by means and force likely to do great bodily harm. The clerk’s transcript and the reporter’s transcript were filed in this court- on February 28, 1935, and the cause was regularly placed on the calendar for April 9, 1935. No appearance has been made on behalf of the appellant either at the time set for oral argument or by brief. The attorney-general has moved to affirm the judgment under section 1253 of the Penal Code.
The motion is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.