Bershon v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 10307 · 1935-03-26 · Published · 5 Cal. App. 2d 519 · 42 P.2d 649 · 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1100

DAVID BERSHON v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. The order of the superior court, transferring to the municipal court the action described in the petition, was made under authority of section 396 of the Code of Civil Procedure as amended in 1933. The matter was purely procedural, and the order did not constitute an attempt to give retroactive effect to the statute. Under such order and transfer the municipal court has jurisdiction over the action. (McClurg v. McClurg, 212 Cal. 15, at p. 18 [297 Pac. 27].)

An application by petitioner to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 6, 1935.

Cites, in this corpus

McClurg v. McClurg Docket No. L.A. 10244. · 1931-03-20

Cited by

Goldie v. Superior Court Civ. No. 1959 · 1936-03-30