gno.law

In re Brown

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 2694 · 1935-03-11 · Published · 5 Cal. App. 2d 218 · 42 P.2d 680 · 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1044

In the Matter of the Application of CLIFFORD L. BROWN for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner is remanded to custody. It is the opinion of this court that the order of the superior court admitting the petitioner to probation for a period of three years after his plea of guilty of violation of section 112 of the California Vehicle Act, and providing as a condition of such probation that defendant serve at the county road camp during the first two years of said probationary period, was an order made within the authority of the court. The condition thus imposed does not violate any provision of section 19a of the Penal Code. See, also, section 1203 of the Penal Code, and particularly that para*219graph thereof defining the court’s power over punishment in connection with orders admitting to probation. There is nothing in section 112 of the California Vehicle Act which limits or changes the power of the court as above stated.

Cited by