gno.law

County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 10086 · 1934-12-28 · Published · 3 Cal. App. 2d 754 · 39 P.2d 477 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1215

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and MIKE MUNGUIA

Area
civil
Panel
Jess E. Stephens (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Stephens

STEPHENS, P. J.

On November 22, 1923, respondent Munguia, who was at that time receiving aid as a county welfare case, was given a work order by the charities de*755partment- of petitioner and while thus engaged suffered injury for which award was made.

The questions here presented are identical with the case of County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Acc. Com., 2 Cal. App. (2d) 614 [38 Pac. (2d) 828], in which we concluded that such an award was improper because the injured party was not an employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Award annulled.

Scott, J., pro tem., and Crail, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by