gno.law

In re Ambrose

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 305 · 1934-12-14 · Published · 3 Cal. App. 2d 752 · 38 P.2d 808 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1214

In the Matter of the Application of EARL AMBROSE for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
other
Panel
Charles R. Barnard (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Barnard

BARNARD, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas, ante, p. 98 [38 Pac. (2d) 806], this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on December 27, 1934.

Cites, in this corpus