People v. Simeone
THE PEOPLE v. ALBERT SIMEONE, Defendants JAMES DUKE
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Jess E. Stephens (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Stephens
STEPHENS, P. J.
Defendant Duke was convicted of first degree burglary and two counts of kidnaping. He gave notice of appeal from the judgment. Appellant’s counseL appeared in open court and requested leave to withdraw from the ease. Such permission was granted. Respondent moves to affirm under Penal Code, section 1253. No briefs have been filed and time for filing opening brief has long since expired.
We have examined the evidence and find it to be sufficient. The instructions were correct. It is clear that the appeal is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Crail, J., and Scott, J., pro tem., concurred.