gno.law

California Treasure Box v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 9595 · 1934-11-13 · Published · 2 Cal. App. 2d 202 · 37 P.2d 731 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401

CALIFORNIA TREASURE BOX (a Corporation) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Area
civil
Panel
Jess E. Stephens (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Stephens

STEPHENS, P. J.

This proceeding is one in mandamus to require the discharge of an attachment issued out of an action in the superior court. It is alleged in the complaint that corporate stock was purchased by the plaintiff under defendant’s false pretenses and that plaintiff promptly rescinded. The prayer is for the return of the purchase money paid with interest.

The facts bring the issue within the principles expressed in McCall v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. (2d) 527 [36 Pac. (2d) 642].

The alternative writ is discharged and the peremptory writ is denied.

Crail, J., and Willis, J., pro tern., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus