gno.law

Wagner v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 5220 · 1934-10-04 · Published · 1 Cal. App. 2d 757 · 36 P.2d 441 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1362

BENNY WAGNER v. THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This cause is before us upon an application of. the above-named petitioner praying that a writ of mandamus be issued directed to the above-named respondent, requiring the respondent to issue an “on sale” wine and beer license to the petitioner. The premises described in the petition are located at 574 Pacific Avenue, otherwise known as “Spider Kelly’s” place.

The record shows that this is an application for a license to sell wine and beer at a place heretofore known as ‘ ‘ Spider Kelly’s” cafe, the only change being in the name.

The evidence taken before the respondent board upon the hearing of the application of the petitioner for an “on sale” wine and beer license is practically identical with the testimony introduced in the case of Parente v. State Board of Equalization, Civil No. 5219 (ante, p. 238 [36 Pac. (2d) 437]), this day decided, to which reference is hereby made.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case above mentioned, the application of the petitioner for a writ of mandate must be, and the same is hereby, denied.

An application by petitioner to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on November 28, 1934.

Langdon, J., voted for a hearing.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by