Morris v. Purity Sausage Co.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 8910 · 1934-09-27 · Published · 1 Cal. App. 2d 120 · 36 P.2d 126 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1238

MATILDA MORRIS v. PURITY SAUSAGE COMPANY

Area: civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

Appellant by motion sought an order for the diminution of the record on appeal so as to include therein a certain affidavit alleged to have been considered in support of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

It appears without dispute that the affidavit in question was served and filed more than ten days after the time permitted by section 659a of the Code of Civil Procedure for the filing of affidavits on motions for a new trial, and, so far as shown, no extension of time was granted. Under such circumstances consideration of the affidavit by the trial court would have been improper (Crofford v. Crofford, 29 Cal. App. 662 [157 Pac. 560]; Terry v. Lesem, 89 Cal. App. 682 [265 Pac. 523]), and we cannot presume that such was the case (2 Cal. Jur., Appeal and Error, sec. 499, p. 852).

The motion is denied.

Cites, in this corpus

Terry v. Lesem Docket No. 5819. · 1928-03-05
Crofford v. Crofford Civ. No. 1786. · 1916-02-14

Cited by

Morris v. Purity Sausage Co. Civ. No. 8910 · 1934-09-27