gno.law

People v. Scheffel

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 1799 · 1934-07-10 · Published · 139 Cal. App. 628 · 34 P.2d 754 · 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 668

THE PEOPLE v. THOMAS SCHEFFEL

Area
criminal
Panel
Schmidt (author), George A. Sturtevant, John T. Nourse

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Schmidt

SCHMIDT, J., pro tem.

In the above-entitled matter the attorney-general has moved that the judgment and order appealed from be affirmed as no briefs have been filed by appellant.

Although no briefs have been filed we have read the entire record. The evidence amply sustains the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty of violating chapter 339, section 1, of the, Statutes of 1923 as charged in count one of the indictment filed in the lower court. The record does not disclose any reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.