gno.law

Plumpe v. Tanner Motor Livery, Inc.

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 9062 · 1934-03-23 · Published · 137 Cal. App. 509

OTTILLIE PLUMPE v. TANNER MOTOR LIVERY, INC. (a Corporation)

Area
civil
Panel
Jess E. Stephens (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Stephens

STEPHENS, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants and against the plaintiff. Upon the filing of appellant’s opening brief respondents (defendants below) moved the dismissal of the appeal or the affirmance of the judgment.

An automobile with chauffeur was hired and the hirer’s valet took the wheel with the hirer’s consent. The vehicle upset and killed the hirer. His mother brought suit against the chauffeur and the owner.

The hirer’s consent to his valet’s operation of the vehicle was in effect a complete assumption of all risks en*510countered thereby, so far as the chauffeur and the owner are concerned.

The judgment is affirmed.

Craig, J., and Hahn, J., pro tem., concurred.