In re Stovall
In the Matter of the Application of DICK STOVALL for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
- Panel
- Jess E. Stephens (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Stephens
STEPHENS, P. J.
Petitioner was regularly bound over to the superior court for trial for pandering. He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.
There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in Ms residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.
The writ is discharged.
Craig, J., and Archbald, J., pro tern., concurred.