gno.law

Rice v. Hardy

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 544 · 1933-09-28 · Published · 134 Cal. App. 397

MARIE C. RICE, by Her Guardian, etc. v. B. W. HARDY

Area
civil
Panel
Jennings (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Jennings

JENNINGS, J.

The clerk’s transcript in this ease was filed on October 25, 1930. No brief has been filed by either party to the action. This court, therefore, on its own motion, noticed an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed, for September 12, 1933.

No cause has been shown why the appeal should not be dismissed and no appearance has been made.

The appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.