People v. Estrada
THE PEOPLE v. RICARDO ESTRADA
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- John F. Pullen (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Pullen
PULLEN, P. J.
Defendant was accused of the crime of robbery and by a jury found guilty of robbery of the second degree. In due time this appeal was taken and the cause submitted.
The transcript of the evidence is brief. But three witnesses were called, the complaining witness, the arresting officer and an eye-witness to the commission of the crime.
We find no errors nor was any particular point of law presented or argued during the trial. An examination *440of the record discloses no error in the proceedings nor does counsel indicate anything justifying a reversal.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Thompson, J., and Plummer, J., concurred.