Christy v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.
ADELE F. CHRISTY, Plaintiffs ALICE M. ALLEN v. OAKLAND TITLE INSURANCE AND GUARANTY COMPANY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Maurice T. Dooling, Jr. (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Dooling
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by three of the plaintiffs from portions of the same judgment, unfavorable to them, which we passed upon in the opinion this day filed in Adele F. Christy et al. v. Oakland Title Insurance and Guaranty Co., No. 8604 (ante, p. 315 [22 Pac. (2d) 737]). Since we held in that case that judgment should go for appellant against all of the plaintiffs, the questions presented on this appeal are thereby rendered moot. The appeal herein is accordingly dismissed.
Spence, Acting P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 25, 1933.
Cites, in this corpus
- Christy v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co. Docket No. 8604. · 1933-05-27