People v. Courtney
THE PEOPLE v. DON COURTNEY, Defendants JOHN J. CREELY
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Archbald (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Archbald
ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.
Defendant Creely was charged jointly, but tried separately, with Don Courtney and John Sullivan (see opinion, People v. Courtney, ante, p. 198 [22 Pac. (2d) 741]), in an indictment returned by the grand jury of Los Angeles County, with the crime of extortion, in count I, and robbery, in count II. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty on count I and not guilty on count II.
Counsel for respondent herein confess that the evidence does not support the verdict and judgment, and with such conclusion we are forced to agree.
Judgment reversed.
Craig, Acting P. J., and Stephens, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Courtney Docket No. 2303. · 1933-05-23