Clayton v. Superior Court
PHINEAS D. CLAYTON v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The petition for an alternative writ of prohibition is denied.
The respondent court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the motion to dissolve petitioner’s attachment (Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc., v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 146 [228 Pac. 19]), and this power did not depend upon the correctness of the decision (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1102; Dahlgren v. Superior Court, 8 Cal. App. 622 [97 Pac. 681] ; People v. San Diego, 71 Cal. App. 421 [236 Pac. 377]).
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. City of San Diego Docket No. 4789. · 1925-02-25
- Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior Court S. F. No. 11090. · 1924-07-18
- Dahlgren v. Superior Court Civ. No. 508. · 1908-08-13