Irwin v. Anspacher
TOBEY IRWIN v. SELMA ANSPACHER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Parker (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Parker
PARKER, J., pro tem.
This is a companion case to Irwin v. Murphy, ante, p. 713 [19 Pac. (2d) 292]. Upon agreement of counsel the decision in either of these cases was to control the decision of the other.
Judgment affirmed.
Tyler, P. J., and Knight, J., concurred.
X
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 20, 1933.
Cites, in this corpus
- Irwin v. Murphy Docket No. 8459. · 1933-02-20