City of Los Angeles v. Abbott
CITY OF LOS ANGELES (a Municipal Corporation) v. SADIE D. GRIFFITH ABBOTT, Defendants BENEVOLENT REALTY HOLDING COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Craig (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Craig
CRAIG, J.
An action in eminent domain having been discontinued following proceedings in injunction to restrain condemnation of properties in the City of Los Angeles, a judgment of dismissal was entered, from which the plaintiff appealed.
Said judgment awarding attorney’s fees is reversed. Upon the authority of City of Los Angeles v. Abbott, 217 Cal. 184 [17 Pac. (2d) 993], the judgment of dismissal must be affirmed.
Works, P. J., and Stephens, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on March 3, 1933.
Cites, in this corpus
- City of Los Angeles v. Abbott Docket Nos. L.A. 13122, 13123, 13124, 13125, 13126, 13127, 13128, 13129, 13130, 13131, 13132, 13133, 13134, 13135, 13136, 13137, 13138, 13139, 13140, 13141, 13142, 13143, 13144, 13145. · 1932-12-30