People v. Greve
THE PEOPLE v. RAY GREVE
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
WORKS, P. J.
J. Appellants were found guilty of rob- bery and on October 11, 1932, the trial court denied a motion made by them for a new trial. At the same time they gave oral notice of appeal. On October 21st, ten days thereafter, they filed request for a transcript of the official court re- porter’s notes of the trial, and in connection with the request they stated the grounds of their appeal. It is provided in section 7 of Rule II of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal that such a request *559statement of grounds of appeal must be made “within five days after giving notice of appeal”. The rule further provides: “If such application is not filed within said time, the appeal shall be dismissed.” (See, also, People v. Schroeder, 112 Cal. App. 550 [297 Pac. 105].)
Appeal dismissed.
Stephens, J., and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Schroeder Docket No. 40. · 1931-03-14