gno.law

In re Clark

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 2265 · 1932-11-10 · Published · 127 Cal. App. 779

In the Matter of the Application of SAM CLARK for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
other
Panel
Jess E. Stephens (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Stephens

STEPHENS, J., pro tem.

The facts of this case are in all essential elements the same as in the case of Application of Claude Williams, (Crim. No. 2264) ante, p. 424 [16 Pac. (2d) 172], this day decided by this court. For the reasons stated in the case referred to the writ herein is discharged.

Works, P. J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus