Miller & Lux Inc. v. Starkey
MILLER & LUX INCORPORATED (a Corporation) v. W. W. STARKEY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Charles R. Barnard (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Barnard
BARNARD, P. J.
The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.
It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College, 103 Cal. App. 139 [283 Pac. 981].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College Docket No. 7187. · 1930-01-10