gno.law

Starkweather v. Eddy

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 8215 · 1932-01-22 · Published · 120 Cal. App. 121

J. W. STARKWEATHER v. F. J. EDDY

Area
civil
Panel
Craig (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Craig

CRAIG, J.

The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *122the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.

Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview of General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal. App. 17 [217 Pac. 1086], said motion should be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P. J., and Friclce, J., pro tern., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus