People v. Ferguson
THE PEOPLE v. HAROLD FERGUSON
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- John F. Tyler (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Tyler
TYLER, P. J.
Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco of a *520felony, to wit, conspiracy to commit robbery. Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty. They were tried and convicted as charged in the information and sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin. Oral notice of appeal was given, but defendants have failed to file a brief in support of the appeal, nor did they appear by counsel when the case was called for hearing. We have examined the record and find no grounds for a reversal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.