In re Harkins
In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM H. HARKINS for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
- Area
- other
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
it is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal. App. 368 [205 Pac. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 21 [297 Pac. 566].
Cites, in this corpus
- Brune v. Superior Court Docket No. 7851. · 1931-03-25
- In Re Rasmusssen Civ. No. 4183. · 1922-02-08