Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission
ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and EARL JOY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John T. Nourse (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Nourse
NOURSE, P. J.
This is an original proceeding in certiorari to review an award of 'respondent in favor of Earl Joy and adverse to the respective insurance carriers of the “San Francisco Examiner” and the “San Francisco Chronicle.” The petitioner herein, as the insurance carrier of the “Chronicle,” attacks that portion of the award adverse to it.
In so far as this petition is concerned the facts are the same as those in Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Civil No. 7473), ante, p. 754 [2 Pac. (2d) 51].
For the reasons therein given the portion of the award relating to the petitioner is annulled.
Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission Docket No. 7473. · 1931-08-03