People v. Riley
THE PEOPLE v. MIKE RILEY
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The defendant in this case was jointly tried with Frank Countryman, J. D. Countryman and Lige Taylor.
The jury found him guilty of operating a still for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes. A motion for a new trial was made and denied by the court. Judgment was imposed and a separate appeal taken.
The points raised for a reversal of the judgment are identical with those presented on the appeal of Frank Countryman, J. D. Countryman and Lige Taylor. On the sixteenth day of June, 1931, we determined all questions raised adversely to appellant’s contentions. Therefore, upon the authority of People v. Countryman, ante, p. 36 [300 Pac. 871], the judgment and order denying a new trial in this case are hereby affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by, the District Court of Appeal on July 1, 1931.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Countryman Docket No. 1155. · 1931-06-16