Solomon v. Franco
V. C. SOLOMON v. JOE FRANCO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The respondent having in open court consented to remit all the judgment above the sum of $249, and it appearing to the court that there is nothing involved in the appeal except the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and it further appearing that the evidence is fully sufficient to support a judgment in that amount, the judgment is modified to read $249 and as so modified is affirmed, respondent to recover costs.