Wheatland v. Baker
E. M. WHEATLAND v. JOHN S. BAKER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Warmer (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Warmer
WARMER, J., pro tem.
This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to recover damages for libel. The question presented on this appeal is precisely the same as presented in the case of Wheatland v. Maloney et al., Civil No. 178 (ante, p. 288 [294 Pac. 499]). On the authority of Wheatland v. Maloney this day decided, the judgment is affirmed.
Cary, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on February 2, 1931.
Seawell, J., and Preston, J., dissented.
Cites, in this corpus
- Wheatland v. Maloney Docket No. 178. · 1930-12-06