Shibley v. Hart
KENNETH SHIBLEY v. HAROLD H. HART
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
An application for a writ of mandamus in the above-entitled matter was filed February 6, 1930, and an alternative writ of mandate was granted and made returnable for March 10, 1930. No showing was made on that day, and since that date numerous continuances have been granted upon the request of the petitioner, but to this date the petitioner has failed to appear and has failed to make any showing why a peremptory writ should issue.
It is therefore ordered that for lack of prosecution the proceedings are dismissed and the alternative writ is discharged.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 4, 1931.