gno.law

Ricci v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 7481 · 1930-07-26 · Published · 107 Cal. App. 756

PETER RICCI v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY

Area
civil
Panel
George A. Sturtevant (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Sturtevant

STURTEVANT, J.

Except a different minor is involved, the facts and the law of this application are the same as in Peter Ricci et al. v. Superior Court et al., Civil No. 7482, ante, p. 395 [290 Pac. 517], this day' filed. Por the reasons there stated the demurrer is sustained and the temporary writ is discharged.

Nourse, P. J., and Spence, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing in this cause was denied hy the District Court of Appeal on August 23, 1930, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on September 23, 1930.

Cites, in this corpus