Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.
IRENE DAVIDSON BUSH v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, a Corporation
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages sustained by her in the death of her son in a railroad grade-crossing accident. The facts involved in this case and the grounds urged for a reversal of the judgment are substantially the same as those in Bush v. Southern Pacific Co. (Civ. No. 4072), ante, p. 101 [289 Pac. 190], this day decided by this court. In appellants’ opening brief it is said: “By stipulation the same evidence offered and introduced in that action was made a part of the evidence in this case, being tried by the same jury and under the same and additional instructions. ’ ’' On the grounds stated in the opinion filed in the case referred to the judgment herein is affirmed.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 26, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, - after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 24, 1930.
Cites, in this corpus
- Bush v. Southern Pacific Co. Docket No. 4072. · 1930-05-27