Kennealy v. Roberts
In the Matter of the Estate of FRANCIS NITA MINER, Deceased EMMA KENNEALY v. CHARLES A. ROBERTS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frederick W. Houser (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Houser
HOUSER, J.
The appeal herein, which is from an order admitting to probate the will of Francis Nita Miner, deceased, is companion to that this day decided by this court under the same title as appears in this appeal (ante, p. 593 [288 Pac. 120]). In substance, the facts presented by the record in the respective appeals are identical one with the other. Relying upon the decision in the former appeal as an authority, it is ordered that the order from which the appeal herein is taken be and it is affirmed.
Conrey, P. J., and York, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 3, 1930, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 7, 1930.
Cites, in this corpus
- Roberts v. Kennealy Docket No. 7038. · 1930-05-12