Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Municipal Court
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY v. MUNICIPAL COURT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Nathaniel P. Conrey (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Conrey
CONREY, P. J.
On writ of review of a summary judgment entered upon forfeiture of a bail bond. The grounds upon which petitioner claims that the judgment should be annulled are included in the questions which have been discussed in our Civil No. 6799, Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court et al., ante, p. 566 [283 Pac. 345], in which the decision has been this day filed. We think that the respondent court acted within, and not in excess of, its jurisdiction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Houser, J., and York, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court Docket No. 6799. · 1929-12-16
Cited by
- People v. Ross Civ. 27458 · 1963-10-22