Edgar v. Citraro
JOHN F. EDGAR v. FRANK CITRARO
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
Respondents move this court to strike the transcript on appeal and appellant’s opening brief from the files of this court and to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that said transcript was transmitted to this court in violation of an order theretofore made by the Superior Court terminating the proceedings to procure the transcript. The motion is based upon the identical facts and circumstances involved in a similar motion made by respondents in a companion case, and which motion has this day been denied. (Edgar et al. v. Citraro et al. (No. 7069) *796ante, p. 545 [283 Pac. 123].) Therefore, upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision in the companion proceeding, the motion herein is denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Edgar v. Citraro Docket No. 7069. · 1929-12-16