gno.law

In re St. John

California Court of Appeal · Crim. No. 1882 · 1929-09-03 · Published · 100 Cal. App. 477

In the Matter of the Application of A. ST. JOHN for a Writ of Habeas Corpus

Area
other

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

It appears that the evidence before the Superior Court, in the contempt proceeding, was sufficient to justify that court in finding that the defendant was then and there financially able to make the payments required of him by the court’s order. (In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal. App. 368 [205 Pac. 72].)

It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be and he hereby is remanded to custody.

Cites, in this corpus