Heefner v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank
MYRTLE M. HEEFNER (a Single Woman) v. CITIZENS TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Craig (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Craig
CRAIG, J.
The facts are similar in this case to' those stated in Wiberg v. Barnum, ante, p. 323 [278 Pac. 871], except that on the back of one of the contracts here involved the following appears:
“We agree to resell lots 14 in Block 48, & lots 2/42, for Mrs. Heefner, and that she will not have to make 2nd payments (6 mos. from now) on same. Resales to be as early as possible.”
For the reasons stated in the decision of that case, this day filed, the judgment herein is reversed.
Works, P. J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing - of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on July 5, 1929, and a petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 5, 1929.
All the Justices present concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Wiberg v. Barnum Docket No. 5228. · 1929-06-06