Hume v. Lindholm
LEEANNA M. HUME v. ALBERT L. LINDHOLM
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- York (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — York
YORK, J.
This is an appeal from an order “certifying, approving and settling the reporter’s transcript on appeal.” Defendant has appealed from the judgment and plaintiff has appealed from the said certification of the transcript on defendant’s appeal.
The jurisdiction of the court to make the certificate can be passed on (if there be a sufficient record of the proceedings) upon defendant’s appeal from the judgment. (Kaltschmidt v. Weber, 136 Cal. 675 [69 Pac. 497].) No appeal lies from an order allowing, or refusing, such certificate. (Henry v. Merguire, 106 Cal. 142 [39 Pac. 599]; Lake v. Harris, 198 Cal. 85, 89 [243 Pac. 417].)
The appeal is dismissed.
Conrey, P. J., and Houser, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Lake v. Harris Docket No. S.F. 11642. · 1926-02-01
- Kaltschmidt v. Weber S.F. No. 3126. · 1902-06-28
- Henry v. Merguire No. 18328 · 1895-02-25