Union Tool Co. v. Porter
UNION TOOL COMPANY (a Corporation) v. ARTHUR LEE PORTER
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Craig (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Craig
CRAIG, Acting P. J.
The action involved in this appeal was filed against the same defendants as those named in that of the California National Supply Company, this day decided, and was instituted for the foreclosure of the appellant’s mechanic’s lien upon the same property and for materials furnished for the same project, as therein described. Both cases were tried together upon similar facts, and the findings, conclusions of law, and judgments are the same in form and effect. Hence, up oh the authority of California National Supply Co. v. Porter, ante, p. 758 [257 Pac. 161], the judgment in this case must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Thompson, J., and Murphey, J., pro tern., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- California National Supply Co. v. Porter Docket No. 4671. · 1927-06-13