Jackson v. Dolan
L. A. JACKSON v. E. J. DOLAN
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- John F. Tyler (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Tyler
TYLER, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The facts are stated in an opinion filed by us this day on an appeal from an order correcting the minutes of the court in the above-entitled action. It appears therefrom that the order granting a new trial was made at a *52time when for all judicial purposes the office of the judge making the order has expired. His act in granting the motion was, therefore, ftmctus officio and of no effect and the case is left in the same condition, in legal contemplation, as though no order disposing of the motion had ever been made, the consequence of which is that it is deemed denied by lapse of time (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 660), and from which no appeal lies. This being so, the question as to whether the motion was rightfully or wrongfully decided on the merits is one that is not properly before us.
For the reasons given the order granting the new trial is reversed.
Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.