People v. Higbee
THE PEOPLE v. MERRITT HIGBEE
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Af S. Sure (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Sure
ST. SURE, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction had upon an information wherein he is charged with the commission of the crime of burglary. This case may be characterized as a companion case to People v. Clinton et al., ante, p. 262 [233 Pac. 78]. The language contained in the charging part of the information is identical and the facts adduced at the trial are substantially the same. The same points are urged for reversal here as were urged there. Upon the authority of People v. Clinton et al., the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for a new trial, Knight, J., and Tyler, P. J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Clinton Docket No. 1199. · 1924-12-16