Arnheim v. Aetna Insurance
FELICE C. ARNHEIM v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The plaintiff was given judgment, on an insurance policy issued by defendant, for damage by fire to the building insured. The facts, except as to parties and amounts recovered, are identical with those involved in Arnheim v. Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, ante, p. 468 [227 Pac. 676]. The appeal was submitted on the briefs in that case.
For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case the judgment herein is affirmed.
A petition by appellant for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on June 25, 1924, and *800a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on July 17, 1924.
All the Justices concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Arnheim v. Firemen's Insurance of Newark Civ. No. 2748. · 1924-05-24