County of Los Angeles v. Daniels
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES v. GILBERT B. DANIELS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Plummer (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Plummer
PLUMMER, J.
This is an action praying for the issuance of a writ of mandate requiring the board of control to audit and allow the claim of the County of Los Angeles for the sum of $12,963.48. The trial court sustained the .defendants’ demurrer to the petitioner’s petition without leave to amend. The matter is now before this court on appeal from the judgment entered after the sustaining of -the respondents’ demurrer as aforesaid. The same questions are involved in this action as were presented for determination in the case of County of Los Angeles v. State, ante, p. 291. [222 Pac. 153], For the reasons therein given, we think the writ of mandate was properly denied, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
Finch, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- County of Los Angeles v. State of California Civ. No. 2574. · 1923-10-31