gno.law

Beardsley v. Johnson

California Court of Appeal · Civ. No. 4130 · 1923-11-24 · Published · 64 Cal. App. 507

JOHN BEARDSLEY v. F. O. JOHNSON, Appellants CHARLES EDWARD BEARDSLEY v. F. O. JOHNSON

Area
civil
Panel
Jesse W. Curtis, Sr. (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion — Curtis

CURTIS, J.

[1] There being no appearance on the part of appellants and no points and authorities being filed in their behalf, the appeal is dismissed.

It further appearing to this court, after examination of the record herein, that there is no merit in this appeal and that the same is frivolous, it is hereby ordered that respondents recover of appellants as damages the sum of one hundred dollars.

Conrey, P. J., and Houser, J., concurred.