People v. Pimintel
THE PEOPLE v. FRANK PIMINTEL
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Finch (author), Hart, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Finch
FINCH, P. J.
While a prisoner in the state prison the defendant was taken outside thereof to work. He was convicted of the crime of escaping from the surveillance of his guards while so outside. The defendant gave notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction, but no brief has been filed in his behalf nor was any appearance made for him at the time set for oral argument. No error appears in the record. The information is substantially the same as those in the cases of People v. French, ante, p. 275 [214 Pac. 1003], and People v. Lewis, post, 280 [214 Pac. 1005].
The judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Lewis Crim. No. 676. · 1923-03-06
- People v. French Crim. No. 679. · 1923-03-06