Luchsinger v. Rolph
ALBERT G. LUCHSINGER, etc. v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.
All the Justices present concurred.
Richards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.
Cites, in this corpus
- Oscar Heyman Brother v. Bath Civ. No. 4309. · 1922-07-11