Chilton v. Rolph
MARY E. CHILTON v. JAMES ROLPH, Jr.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
[1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of - appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922.
All the Justices present concurred.
Bichards, J., pro tern., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.
Cites, in this corpus
- Oscar Heyman Brother v. Bath Civ. No. 4309. · 1922-07-11