People v. Warner
THE PEOPLE v. ARCHIE WARNER
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnett
BURNETT, J.
Defendant was charged with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. He was convicted of assault and sentenced to pay a fine of $125. The appeal is from the judgment. The evidence has not been brought up and only the judgment-roll is available to ascertain whether any error was committed. [1] The record ,has been examined, and outside of a clerical mistake in the information, nothing of an irregular nature has been discovered. Said mistake consists of the omission of the defendant’s name in one portion of said information, but it is manifest that no prejudice resulted therefrom. Indeed, appellant has not argued the ease in this court either orally or by brief, and *71this failure may he deemed an admission that no cause exists for a reversal.
The judgment is affirmed.
Prewett, P. J., pro tern., and Hart, J., concurred.