Crocker Wheeler Co. v. American Bonding Co.
CROCKER WHEELER COMPANY (a Corporation) v. AMERICAN BONDING COMPANY OF BALTIMORE (a Corporation)
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Frank G. Finlayson (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Finlayson
FINLAYSON, P. J.
[1] Plaintiff, a materialman who had sold to a building contractor material used in the construction of a building, brought this action upon a bond that had been given by the contractor, and executed by defendant, to secure the payment of labor and material claims. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
The bond is the same bond that was before the supreme court in General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore, 180 Cal. 765, [182 Pac. 444], Appellant makes the. same points here that were unsuccessfully urged by it there. In every particular, this case is ruled by the decision in that case. For this reason the judgment must be and is affirmed.
Sloane, J., and Thomas, J., concurred.
Cites, in this corpus
- Pemberton v. Arny L. A. No. 4923. · 1919-07-30
- General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of Baltimore L. A. No. 5781. · 1919-07-05